Close

Articles Posted in CPAVille

Updated:

Divisible Property in Equitable Distribution

North Carolina General Statutes Section 50-20(b) (4) defines divisible property. Divisible property covers certain values created post-separation. A husband that continued to work in a dental practice post-separation did not create active appreciation.   Husband did not change anything about his business methods to increase business. The growth between the date…

Updated:

A Lost Alimony Deduction by Linking to Child Support

Watch out for those hurried, last minute North Carolina agreements that link alimony and child support termination; you could get an unintended tax consequence and the loss of the tax deduction. While the Johnson case, discussed herein, is not a North Carolina case, it could be.  Guys and gals, you…

Updated:

Tax Dangers of Unallocated Family Support (Baur v. Comm’r)

It is tempting to lump child support and post separation support/alimony into a bucket of one dollar amount, sometimes referred to as “family support”.  This is particularly tempting in the early part of a case, but it is DANGEROUS.  A couple of tax rules will help: Rule 1:  Don’t create…

Updated:

Technicalities on “Death Termination” for Alimony Deduction (Wignall v. Comm’r)

by Carolyn J. Woodruff, JD, CPA, CVA

North Carolina alimony statutes and state case law make technicalities on the “death” element of alimony under federal tax law difficult, and one needs to exercise extreme care when drafting a private alimony agreement or contract in North Carolina. Unlike many states, all alimony awards in North Carolina are not…

Updated:

So the Wife ends up in Tax Court for Mixing Alimony and Child Support…Don’t Do This! (Schilling v. Comm’r)

by Carolyn J. Woodruff, JD, CPA, CVA

Schilling v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2012‑256, 2012 WL 3848477 (2012) (a) Facts: The parties settled their divorce case by signing a separation agreement. The agreement awarded the wife $2,450 per month on spousal support for six years.  It, further, provided that the wife’s spousal support would drop by specified amounts…

Updated:

A Summary on Current law regarding Innocent Spouse and Thoughts on how this affects a North Carolina Divorce : Part 4 of 4 Parts

By Carolyn J. Woodruff, JD, CPA, CVA

This article is part 4 of a series of articles regarding Innocent Spouse.  This final blog on the basics of the current Innocent Spouse tax law will do two things:  1) summarize changes discussed in the first three articles; 2) give some practical guidance to attorneys, CPAs, and clients in…

Updated:

Requirements for Discretionary Innocent Spouse Relief : Part 3 of 4 Parts

by Carolyn J. Woodruff, JD, CPA, CVA

Part 3 of a 4-Part Series on Innocent Spouse Basics (a) The Former Requirements: Rev. Proc. 2003-61, 2003‑32 I.R.B. 296, 2003 WL 21708514 (Aug. 11, 2003) (b) The New Requirements: Rev. Proc. 2013-34, 2013‑43 I.R.B. 397, 2013 WL 5179241 (Oct. 21, 2013) (1) This is the new Revenue Procedure setting…

Updated:

Statutes of Limitations for Innocent Spouse Actions : Part 2 of 4 Parts

by Carolyn J. Woodruff, JD, CPA, CVA

This article is part 2 of a 4 part series on Innocent Spouse basics.  Be sure to read all four parts.  Also, check this blog regularly for new information on innocent spouse law, as I will write about it frequently.  I’ll keep you posted of new cases and developments from…

Updated:

Innocent Spouse: the Basics of I.R.C. § 6015 : Part 1 of 4 Parts

by Carolyn J. Woodruff, JD, CPA, CVA

I have always said:  “the Internal Revenue Service is the third party to the North Carolina Divorce”.  It is, therefore, incumbent upon parties to a divorce, their counsel, and their CPAs in North Carolina to understand the Innocent Spouse rules of the Internal Revenue Code, particularly if there are tax…

Updated:

Make sure your beneficiary designations are correct to avoid entanglement between your former spouse and your current spouse. Don’t invite that fight with poor planning!

By Carolyn J. Woodruff, North Carolina Family Law Specialist, JD, CPA, CVA

I.R.C. § 414(p) and 29 U.S.C. § 1056 Morris v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 751 F. Supp. 2d 955 (E.D. Mich. 2010) (a) Facts: When the husband and the wife were divorced, the state court divorce decree extinguished all rights held by one in any life insurance of the other. …

Contact Us