Close

Articles Posted in Tax

Updated:

Innocent Spousal Relief Take 3: A Single Mistake Can Cost Thousands (Hammernik v. Comm’r)

By: Dana M. Horlick, Attorney, Woodruff Family Law Group

Hammernik v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2014-170, 2014 WL 4119398 (2014) (a) Facts: A husband and wife were divorced in Wisconsin. In 2003, before the divorce, the husband’s business encountered hard times, and he withdrew $104,909 from his personal retirement account to pay living expenses. The parties filed a joint income tax…

Updated:

Lack of Knowledge and Access is a Recipe for Innocent Spouse Relief (Varela v. Comm’r)

By: Dana M. Horlick, Attorney, Woodruff Family Law Group

Varela v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2014-222, 2014 WL 53656631 (2014) (a) Facts: A husband and wife filed joint tax returns for 2007 and 2008. The IRS assessed deficiencies. The wife petitioned the Tax Court for innocent spouse relief, and the husband intervened, asking the court to deny the request. The court…

Updated:

A Note on Same-Sex Marriage Before Diving into Innocent Spouse Relief (Obergefell v. Hodges)

By: Dana M. Horlick, Attorney, Woodruff Family Law Group

Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015) (a) Two years ago, it appeared that the United States would be divided for some years between states that recognize same-sex marriage, and states that do not recognize same- sex marriage. (b) After Windsor, most federal courts held that state provisions refusing to recognize…

Updated:

Signed, Sealed, Delivered: Having a Signed Form 8832 is Crucial for Claiming a Dependency Exemption (Porter v. Comm’r)

Porter v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2015-141, 2015 WL 4638622 (2015) (a) Facts: A husband and wife were divorced in Florida. The decree awarded the wife custody of the parties’ three children. It allowed the wife to claim the exemptions for the oldest and youngest children, but allowed the husband to claim…

Updated:

Without Custody or a Form 8832, A Dependency Exemption is Not in the Cards (Henricks v. Comm’r)

Henricks v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2014-192, 2014 WL 4723148 (2014) (a) Facts: A Florida divorce decree awarded custody of two children to the wife. It allowed the wife to claim one child as a dependent for tax purposes, and allowed the husband to claim the other child as a dependent for…

Updated:

Dot Your I’s and Cross Your T’s: the IRS is a Tough Grader, Especially for Dependency Exemptions and Child Tax Credits (McBride v. Comm’r)

By: Dana M. Horlick, Attorney, Woodruff Family Law Group

McBride v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2015-6, 2015 WL 393011 (2015) (a) Facts: The taxpayer, his grown son and daughter, and his daughter’s child all lived in the same household. On her federal tax return, the daughter claimed an exemption for her child. On his federal tax return, the taxpayer claimed dependency…

Updated:

A Gift by Any Other Name is Still a Gift in the Court’s Eyes (Hughes v. Comm’r)

By: Dana M. Horlick, Attorney, Woodruff Family Law Group

Hughes v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2015-89, 2015 WL 2180505 (2015) (a) Facts: A husband owned stock in a consulting business that was growing in value. He was afraid that if he retained the stock, his former wife would seek to reopen their divorce decree. He therefore gave the stock to his…

Updated:

Pay On Time and in Cash or You Can Forget About that Alimony Deduction (Muniz v. Comm’r)

By: Dana M. Horlick, Attorney, Woodruff Family Law Group

Muniz v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2015-125, 2015 WL 4126356 (2015) (a) Facts: A Florida separation agreement provided that the husband would pay wife $1,000 per month in alimony. The husband did not pay on time, and the court entered an enforcement order directing the husband to pay $6,000 in alimony due under…

Updated:

Alimony, Separation Agreements, and Attorney Fees: 2015 Tax Court (Milbourne v. Comm’r)

Milbourne v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2015-13, 2015 WL 393040 (2015) (a)  Facts: A husband and his wife separated. She proposed a separation agreement, which required him to pay $6,000 per month in alimony. The husband refused to sign this agreement, as he did not want to pay more than $2,500 per…

Updated:

Alimony Arrearages and Federal Tax Consequences (Iglicki v. Comm’r)

Iglicki v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2015-80, 2015 WL 1886010 (2015) (a)  Facts: A Maryland separation agreement required a husband to pay $735 per month in child support to a wife. If the husband defaulted on child support, he would immediately become liable for $1,000 per month in spousal support. Liability…

Contact Us