Wasting a court’s time and resources can lead to hefty fines and other penalties for parties who file bad faith complaints. Attorney fees are often awarded in cases where the court determines the plaintiff or other moving party filed their claim in bad faith. Continue reading →
Courts must have jurisdiction to hear a case. Jurisdiction can be established in numerous ways, including by subject matter or geography. If a party to a case wants to appeal a ruling, the court of appeals must ensure they have appellate jurisdiction, which is the authority to review a lower court’s decision. Interlocutory appeals present unique challenges when determining appellate jurisdiction because there are strict rules concerning the types of orders and judgments that can be appealed, such as whether or not the appealed ruling is considered final. Continue reading →
Among the most complex issues involved in divorce cases is the distribution of retirement benefits through the entry of Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs). Retirement plans that are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) must be divided by QDROs, and alternate payees of such plans can be spouses, ex-spouses, or dependents of the plan participant.
When the participant dies before retirement, their surviving spouse is often the recipient of their retirement benefits. However, distributing funds in these circumstances can quickly become a challenge if there are multiple parties with claims to the funds and there is no QDRO in place. Continue reading →
In North Carolina, a habitual felon is someone who has been convicted of or pled guilty to three felonies. These defendants may be indicted as habitual felons if they have been designated as such and have been charged with another felony. North Carolina law also states that a defendant may not be prosecuted just to establish them as a habitual felon; there must be an existing felony case that the habitual felon proceeding can accompany. Continue reading →
When spouses in North Carolina divorce, retirement funds and pension benefits are among the many assets that may be divided between the parties. If you were awarded a portion of your ex-spouse’s pension benefits, the question of when you can receive your payments often has a complicated answer. Often a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) will be required to divide retirement benefits, and the standards for QDROs are set by a federal law known as ERISA, or the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Continue reading →
March is Women’s History Month, a time to celebrate the achievements of the countless women who have shaped the course of history. In the legal world, the Supreme Court is the pinnacle of the judiciary, and the six women who have served as Supreme Court Justices have played a major part in the Court’s evolution. As we celebrate Women’s History Month, let’s take a moment to honor their legacies and celebrate their invaluable contributions to the Court. Continue reading →
Spouses going through divorce proceedings in North Carolina may eventually have the option to file an appeal of a final order, but appealing a decision is not as easy as filing one or two documents. There are extensive requirements, and while some are relatively simple, like the requirement that the appeal be filed within 30 days, others, like the appellate court’s record, require strategic planning. Continue reading →
Regular employment income is not the only type of income that can be used to determine child support obligations in North Carolina. The state’s child support guidelines allow a variety of financial sources to be considered as income for support purposes, including salaries, wages, commissions, dividends, pensions, trusts, unemployment benefits, gifts, prizes, and self-employment income. Continue reading →
Self-executing modifications are provisions within a contract or order that amend the terms upon a specified event that may occur in the future. The legality of these provisions varies from state to state; some states have determined that self-executing modifications are typically illegal, and others have yet to make any clear or definitive decisions about the legality of such terms.
The North Carolina Court of Appeals case of Madison v. Gonzalez-Madison involved a self-executing modification in a custody order, and the appellate court’s ruling provided clarification on North Carolina’s laws regarding this issue. Continue reading →
Courts in North Carolina often enter temporary orders on child custody because time is of the essence in such an important issue. These temporary orders must be followed until the court makes a final ruling, but temporary and permanent orders are handled differently in terms of requesting changes. Is returning to court for a final ruling the only way for an order to become permanent? Continue reading →
North Carolina Divorce Lawyers Blog