Articles Tagged with Marital Property

Published on:

Equitable distribution in North Carolina can involve numerous types of marital property and hybrid property, including real estate, bank accounts, investments, vehicles, and personal property like jewelry. Retirement accounts are also a common asset that courts are asked to divide in divorces, but distributing certain retirement plans comes with complex legal requirements. Continue reading →

Published on:

Equitable distribution is a process in which the court, rather than dividing everything 50/50, determines what a fair division of the spouses’ property is. In some cases, an even split is equitable, but when a fair share is not equitable, the courts have the ability to divide the property unevenly. Continue reading →

Published on:

In the intricate world of family law, the equitable distribution of assets during a divorce can often lead to contentious disputes. A notable example is the case of Roberts v. Kyle, Executor of the Estate of Roberts. This case sheds light on the challenges courts face when determining the classification of personal vs. marital property in the context of divorce proceedings. Continue reading →

Published on:

Bankruptcy can complicate family law proceedings, especially when trying to determine what assets will be distributed. Normally, bankruptcy can be used to shield certain properties from being included in divorce proceedings. However, certain types of assets will not be excluded because of one spouse declaring bankruptcy.

If your former partner declares bankruptcy during divorce proceedings, will that preclude you from being able to recover an interest in their pension benefits? Continue reading →

Published on:

When trial courts enter orders in family law matters, such as alimony orders or equitable distribution orders, either party may appeal as long as they meet the requirements. There are various stipulations, such as rules about appealing interlocutory or temporary orders, but the general rule is that orders entered by trial courts are appealable if done at the right time.

Once an appeal has been filed and noted, can the court that entered the appealed order issue other orders in the same matter?

Crowell v. Crowell

Published on:

As part of the North Carolina divorce process, spouses often have assets that need to be divided between them. Equitable distribution is an option if one or both spouses request it, and it is the process by which the court will divide the property in a way that is equitable but not always equal. Continue reading →

Published on:

Equitable distribution is available in North Carolina divorces whenever either party requests it. The court will determine the most equitable division of assets and debts, which is not always an equal split. Determining the most equitable distribution of the spouses’ property involves various factors, including: Continue reading →

Published on:

In a recent case involving trust property in an equitable distribution dispute, the North Carolina Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a trial court’s decision not to add a trust as a necessary party to the case. Continue reading →

Published on:

The language in any contract must be clear and unambiguous, and this standard is true of settlement agreements in divorce proceedings as well. When the terms of an agreement are left open to interpretation, it can lead to issues like contention and litigation. Continue reading →

Published on:

The division of property is one of the most significant factors in many North Carolina divorces. Spouses accumulate substantial assets and debts throughout their marriage, including real estate, retirement accounts, investment portfolios, vehicles, and bank accounts. North Carolina statutes support equitable distribution, meaning that if either spouse requests it a court will determine a fair and equitable division of marital property.

Spouses with prenuptial or premarital agreements may believe that this contract prevents an equitable distribution of property in a divorce, but that may not be true. Precise wording is critical because not all agreements meet the requirements to waive equitable distribution.

Continue reading →